Published by Zergling_man

published

View Profile

Zergling_man's Post

In Reply To: this post

@dj If LE cared about internet security they would be advocating for real web-of-trust instead of offering stopgaps in this protection racket.
Also they would acknowledge ACME as the steaming pile of shit it is.

Likes: 0
Boosts: 0
Hashtags:
Mentions: @a1hwoqtjv13r0001@ti.parcero.casa

Comments

Displaying 0 of 2 comments

DJ :catcrunk: :dance: :gigachad:

In response to this post

@Zergling_man@sacred.harpy.faith
I don't know what that means so I can't argue. But I also won't look a gift horse in the mouth. LE with dns validation works great for me.


@dj I'm happy to discuss/explain anything I mention.
I have my own 100-line ACME client based on a 400-line python script that was designed to be "so simple you can audit it yourself"... That contains one mega-function that defines about 5 others as it operates, and some 8000-line acme.sh that seems to want to support absolutely everything.
My conclusion is: It's doing about 3x as much as it needs to.

by Zergling_man ;

Mentions: @Zergling_man@sacred.harpy.faith

Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 0

pomstan

In response to this post

@Zergling_man @dj what's wrong with acme


@pomstan @dj What's not wrong with acme

by Zergling_man ;

Mentions: @Zergling_man@sacred.harpy.faith @a1hwoqtjv13r0001@ti.parcero.casa

Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 0