Published by Ramesh #NotGoingBack

published

Ramesh #NotGoingBack's Post

In Reply To: this post

⬆️ @ChrisMayLA6 @alexproe

>> so it is working, then; just not for us...

>> So it's not so much has been rejected, but rather it's only applicable when the rich are in trouble!

theory formed the underpinnings of 's obscene theory in which the rich would reinvest money saved in taxes to drive growth.

has the rich getting richer while infrastructure like bridges and airports crumble, and services like are only for those who can afford to pay.


Likes: 0
Boosts: 0
Hashtags: #keynes #keynsian #reagan #trickledown #us #heathcare #keynes #keynsian #reagan #trickledown #us #heathcare
Mentions: @ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us @alexproe@mastodon.uno @ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us @alexproe@mastodon.uno

Comments

Displaying 0 of 1 comments

Emeritus Prof Christopher May

In response to this post

@rameshgupta @alexproe

If Reagan's economists where Keynsians, then they were the bastardisation called neo-Keynsianism that was an out growth of neo-classical economics that sought to mimic some of the discourse of Keynsianism with none of the progressive content... just calling yourself a Keynsian (if they did) doesn't;t make you one....

The problems you identify are real, but they are not due to Keynsian economics - that is all about 'effective demand' not enriching the already wealthy!


⬆️ @ChrisMayLA6

They spun the basic tenet of or Theory:

Per , "Keynesians believe that… fluctuations in ANY component of spending,… [e.g.] investment,… cause output to change. If government spending increases, for example, and all other spending components remain constant, then output will increase".

's connivers substituted "rich" for "government" and claimed the RICH would drive growth by reinvesting money saved in taxes.

@alexproe

imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd

by Ramesh #NotGoingBack ;

Mentions: @rameshgupta@mastodon.social @alexproe@mastodon.uno


Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 0