The Nexus of Privacy

thenexusofprivacy's pfp

Contacting The Nexus of Privacy

Federation handle:

@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange

The Nexus of Privacy's Information

The Nexus of Privacy's Bio

A newsletter about , , , , and .

Posts by @jdp23. Also on Bluesky

The Nexus of Privacy's Posts

The Nexus of Privacy has 7 posts.


The Nexus of Privacy

In response to this post

And speaking of leaks @caseynewton on Platformer and Sam Biddle in the Intercept have details on the new Meta guidelines and the guidance they're giving moderators

CW: some really sickening examples of anti-trans hate speech now explicitly allowed by Meta

platformer.news/meta-new-trans (partially paywalled, but the examples are visibile even without logging in)

theintercept.com/2025/01/09/fa


Tags: #meta #threads #fedipact

Mentions: @caseynewton@mastodon.social


Likes: 0

Replies: 0

Boosts: 1

The Nexus of Privacy

In response to this post

On @404mediaco , @jasonkoebler reports that "‘It’s Total Chaos Internally at Meta Right Now", with employees very upset about the changes -- and highlights that these didn't go through the usual processes of broud employee feedback.

404media.co/its-total-chaos-in

The paywalled article also has a lot of quotes from internal discussions. Meta's clearly leaking like a seive right about now ....


And speaking of leaks @caseynewton on Platformer and Sam Biddle in the Intercept have details on the new Meta guidelines and the guidance they're giving moderators

CW: some really sickening examples of anti-trans hate speech now explicitly allowed by Meta

platformer.news/meta-new-trans (partially paywalled, but the examples are visibile even without logging in)

theintercept.com/2025/01/09/fa

by The Nexus of Privacy ;

Tags: #meta #threads #fedipact

Mentions: @404mediaco@mastodon.social @jasonkoebler@mastodon.social


Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 0

The Nexus of Privacy

In response to this post

Also, the changes Meta is making to Facebook's feed algorithm "will make it more likely to recommend extreme and polarizing content".

Here's an excellent Bluesky thread on that from Laura Edelson (Chief Technologist at the Civil Rights Division in the Department of Justice):

bsky.app/profile/whiskeyocelot

An excerpt:

"The return to an algorithm that drives more politics and more extreme rabbit holes is a return the Facebook of 2016-2020. This has some business upsides, by both cutting costs and juicing user engagement (aka, ad revenues). But it has very, very serious downsides for users and for communities.

Because the hate speech policies and the algorithmic changes that were rolled back this week were developed in response to very real offline violence, including genocide in Myanmar, that were fomented on Facebook. This is a plan to go back to that algorithm and those policies."


Tags: #threads #meta #fedipact


Likes: 0

Replies: 0

Boosts: 0

The Nexus of Privacy

Agreed that Meta's changes are troubling and concerning. So I would strongly urge you and any instance admin exposing their users to the harassment there to reconsider their alignment with Threads and defederate now .

That's expecially for you and mastodon.social. Think about the message that you're sending: "Instead of proactively protecting people on this instance, we'll wait for you to be harassed and then take action on individual harassers. And, we'll make that the default for new Mastodon users!"

There's a huge opportunity for Mastodon here if you take a courageous position. So please do!

@Gargron



Likes: 0

Replies: 0

Boosts: 0

The Nexus of Privacy

In response to this post

It's worth highlighting how much organizing there's been here in the 18+ months since Meta first announced their plans to embrace, extend, and exploit the Fediverse.

@jat23's Closing the Door to Remain Open: The Politics of Openness and the Practices of Strategic Closure in the Fediverse is a great overview.

And from June 2023, the "Why the Anti-Meta Fedi Pact is good strategy for people who want the fediverse to be an alternative to surveillance capitalism" section of Should the Fediverse welcome its new surveillance-capitalism overlords? Opinions differ! talks about the importance of the .


Also, the changes Meta is making to Facebook's feed algorithm "will make it more likely to recommend extreme and polarizing content".

Here's an excellent Bluesky thread on that from Laura Edelson (Chief Technologist at the Civil Rights Division in the Department of Justice):

bsky.app/profile/whiskeyocelot

An excerpt:

"The return to an algorithm that drives more politics and more extreme rabbit holes is a return the Facebook of 2016-2020. This has some business upsides, by both cutting costs and juicing user engagement (aka, ad revenues). But it has very, very serious downsides for users and for communities.

Because the hate speech policies and the algorithmic changes that were rolled back this week were developed in response to very real offline violence, including genocide in Myanmar, that were fomented on Facebook. This is a plan to go back to that algorithm and those policies."

by The Nexus of Privacy ;

Tags: #fedipact


Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 1

The Nexus of Privacy

With today's news that Meta is getting rid of fact checkers and changing its policies to allow more hate speech directed at trans and queer people, seems like a good time to resurface these detailed instructions on how to block Threads.

privacy.thenexus.today/how-to-

If you want even more protection, your best bet is to move to an instance that's blocking threads -- see fedipact.veganism.social to check the status of your instance. And I agree with @kissane's recommendation in the excellent Untangling Threads

"I think the nearest thing to reasonably sturdy protection for people on fedi who have good reason to worry about the risk surface Threads federation opens up is probably to either…

  • block Threads and post followers-only or or local-only, for fedi services that support it, or
  • operate from a server that federates only with servers that also refuse to federate with Threads—which is a system already controversial within the fediverse because allowlists are less technically open than denylists."


It's worth highlighting how much organizing there's been here in the 18+ months since Meta first announced their plans to embrace, extend, and exploit the Fediverse.

@jat23's Closing the Door to Remain Open: The Politics of Openness and the Practices of Strategic Closure in the Fediverse is a great overview.

And from June 2023, the "Why the Anti-Meta Fedi Pact is good strategy for people who want the fediverse to be an alternative to surveillance capitalism" section of Should the Fediverse welcome its new surveillance-capitalism overlords? Opinions differ! talks about the importance of the .

by The Nexus of Privacy ;

Tags: #fedipact #meta #threads


Likes: 0

Replies: 1

Boosts: 1

The Nexus of Privacy

@FediPact yes, this latest news just once again highlights how important is!


Tags: #fedipact


Likes: 0

Replies: 0

Boosts: 0