▬ :luigi_uhc:
Contacting ▬ :luigi_uhc:
Federation handle:
@rat@ni.hil.ist
▬ :luigi_uhc:'s Information
▬ :luigi_uhc:'s Bio
⦁
"Those affiliated with the plot have no need to hope for a distant better future; they know a sure means to pluck joy immediately:
Destroy passionately!"
— Zo d’Axa
⦁
#anarchy, #nihilism, #ekoekstremism & #vengeance & fvck #politicalCorrectness & fvck #identityPolitics & fvck #yourMorality !
▬
▬ :luigi_uhc:'s Posts
▬ :luigi_uhc: has 133 posts.
▬ :luigi_uhc:
poor ppl #looting the rich — no problem
Tags: #looting #looting
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXTaErgcNFY
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiYCQYl4vYONBYDrgPoDBlQ
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0znVi49iv4
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUIG2Gcq_E8
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiYCQYl4vYONBYDrgPoDBlQ
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
Likes: 0
Replies: 1
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/renzo-novatore
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/enzo-martucci
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
In response to this posthttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bruno-filippi-the-rebel-s-dark-laughter-the-writings-of-bruno-filippi
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
https://anarchybang.com/
such nice and light and friendly conversations / discussions we do have in europe
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bruno-filippi-the-rebel-s-dark-laughter-the-writings-of-bruno-filippi
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/enzo-martucci
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/renzo-novatore
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
Likes: 0
Replies: 3
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
https://anarchybang.com/podcast/episode-43-anarchist-music/
I anticipated a conversation about Anarchist Music. Where does it begin and end. What is great Anarchist Music today? Do Spotify set lists inform or infuriate? That is not what happened.
We had generation gap fights. We fought about Thin Lizzy. We did everything wrong and yet we survived. We talked about “Anarchist” “music” and it was an interested collision of opinions, some stories, and another episode of Anarchy Bang!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUIG2Gcq_E8
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0znVi49iv4
by ▬ :luigi_uhc: ;
Likes: 0
Replies: 2
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
this https://warzonedistro.noblogs.org/post/2017/09/07/lions-in-the-brush-on-the-anatomy-and-guidelines-of-cell-structured-resistance/ and similar combat models are and will be more important in the coming years due to the rise of the fascists and autocrats in our whole wide world
ammut you motherfvcker where are you :-)
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
#luigi
Tags: #luigi
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
Degrowth or Extinction
▬ :luigi_uhc: Boosted#fuckWorldTrade
a classic :emergency::doge:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCuaZxkUhIE
Tags: #fuckworldtrade
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 1
▬ :luigi_uhc:
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/willful-disobedience-wolfi-landstreicher#toc49
REVOLUTIONARY SOLIDARITY: An insurrectionary anarchist perspective
“Solidarity lies in action. Action that sinks its roots in one’s own project[...] that above all makes us free ourselves...” —Daniela Carmignani
Revolutionary solidarity is not essentially a question of moral, financial or physical support, but something far deeper, because it is essentially egoistically centered. The basis for revolutionary solidarity lies in recognizing one’s own project of revolt in the struggles and actions of others and thus seeing these others, at least potentially, as accomplices in struggle.
Therefore, revolutionary solidarity can only exist when one has a clear project of revolt from which it can sprout. The nature of the insurrectionary anarchist project is the reappropriation of one’s own life in open conflict with every form of domination and exploitation; it is the overturning of existing social relationships and the destruction of all hierarchy and authority and of the commodity system with the aim of opening the fullest possibilities for free association. It is this that forms the basis from which I, as an exploited individual fighting to take back my life and a conscious insurrectionary anarchist, determine and express revolutionary solidarity.
From this it should be clear that I see no possibility for solidarity between insurrectionary anarchists and any group that claims to lead, represent or even (like so many politicians of the democratic left) serve any struggle. In their specialized role as spokespeople for (their version of) whatever specific struggle, hierarchy and authority already exist. They are contenders for power and, thus, its practical accomplices. So it shouldn’t be surprising that at one point or another, the leaders of these groups begin to make demands of the current rulers, demands that are the first step to negotiation and taking one’s place within the current social order.
But every social struggle has many different layers and facets. While various political, union or guerrilla groups strive to impose their “service” on the struggles of the exploited and excluded, many individuals go on carrying out their struggles autonomously, organizing their attempts to take back their lives and attack what stands in their way in free association with others of their choosing. In any struggle, we find our accomplices, those with whom we can act in solidarity, among these individuals.
And what does it mean to act in solidarity with others in struggle? Above all, it means to carry on our own struggle against every form of domination and exploitation where we are. The stat, capital and all the institutions through which they exercise their power constitute a totality, and every attack on a part, even the tiniest subversion, the least expression of self-organized revolt, is an attack on the whole. But there are points where my struggle more specifically intersects with that of others. This is where solidarity can have its clearest expressions. Consider, for example, the uprising that began in Argentina last December. It was sparked by economic policies put into play by specific institutions. These institutions have offices, functionaries, properties and connections with other institutions throughout the world and exercise their exploitative practices everywhere. Specifically target actions against these institutions and their connections anywhere in the world could provide a clear expression of solidarity with those in revolt in Argentina. Similarly, solidarity with prisoners’ struggles could find expression in attacks against institutions, corporations and functionaries involved in the prison industry that are often involved in other exploitative projects that affect all of our lives. The possibilities are as broad as our imaginations.
In the same way, solidarity with anarchists who have been imprisoned is manifested by acting as their accomplices, continuing our struggles against the state and capital, the source of their imprisonment. Taking action that makes the link of complicity between our revolt and that of our imprisoned comrades obvious only requires a bit of knowledge and creativity.
Revolutionary solidarity is the active expression of a link between projects of struggle and revolt. It is a relationship of complicity, not of service or support (though under specific circumstances, in the context of mutual aid between comrades, one might incorporate some form of support into a relationship of solidarity). One enters into it in terms of one’s own project, without compromise. Thus, as an insurrectionary anarchist, as an individual in revolt against every form of domination, exploitation and hierarchy, my solidarity is always only with those aspects of a struggle in which individuals act autonomously to take back their own lives and organize their own relationships and activities freely, striving to destroy everything that obstructs these attempts, particularly the organizations and leaders who claim to represent the struggle.
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
▬ :luigi_uhc:
https://www.jkrishnamurti.org/content/%EF%BB%BFjkrishnamurti-benares-1st-public-talk-16th-january-1949/1949
#Question: You are preaching the idea of one world, of a classless society, which is the basis of Communism. But what are your sanctions, what is your technique for the new revolution?
#Krishnamurti: Now, what do you mean by sanctions? You mean, what is my authority, don't you? Who has given me authority to speak? Or, what is my label? In other words, you are interested are you not? - in the label, in the name, to find out who has given me authority, the sanction. Which means that you are more interested in knowing my label than in finding out what truth there is in what I am saying. Aren't you? Are you listening Sirs, or paying attention to something else? Sir, this is rather an important question, and we will go into it fairly thoroughly, shall we?
Most of us appreciate a thing, or follow a thing, because it has been sanction by authority. So-and-so has painted a picture, therefore it must be beautiful picture. So-and-so has write a poem, and he is well-known, therefore that poem must be good. He has a large following, therefore what he says must be true. In other words, your sanction depends on popularity, on success, on the richness of language, on outward show, Doesn't it? So, when you ask me what my sanction is, you want to know if I am the World Teacher. And I say, don't let us be stupid. Whether I am or I am not, is irrelevant; it is utterly unimportant what my sanction is. But what is, is fundamentally important is to examine what I am saying, to find out for your self without the comfort of authority. That is why I am against organization; that is one of the reasons; because organizations, spiritually, create a back ground of authority; but a man who is seeking truth is not concerned with authority, neither of a book, the Bhagavad Gita, the Bible nor of a person. He is seeking truth, not the authority of a per son. So, as long as you are looking at the label to find out if that label is worth worshipping, listening to, I am afraid that you and I are wasting our time. Because, I have no authority, I have no sanction. I am saying something which to me is true by direct experience, not through reading some books and following somebody. Because, I have not read any of the so-called psychological, religious books; and as it is my direct experience, if you wish to look at it, you are perfectly welcome; but if you look around the corner for the label, you won't find it; and I'm afraid most of us are doing that. That is why this question is asked, "What is your sanction?" Since I have no sanction, since I have no authority, I am not acting as a guru, or as an authority for you or for any other person. So, if you are interested, you will listen to what I am saying directly and find out the truth of what is being said; which means you must strip your mind of all authority and be capable of looking at things directly and simply.
Now, the questioner wants to know also, what is the new technique that I propose. Now, Sir, let us again understand that word technique. Is revolution a matter of technique? A political revolution, a sociological revolution, may need a certain technique, because you can pursue a certain ideology to produce a certain result; and to produce that result, you must know that ideology and the way to work out that ideology whether the communistic ideology, or the fascist, or the capitalist, you must learn a technique to produce a result; but is that the fundamental revolution? Will a technique produce the true revolution? There must be a radical, fundamental revolution sociologically. The whole thing has to be transformed. Now, will a technique transform it, technique being a method, a way? Or, must there be individuals, you and I, who understand the problem, and who in themselves are in a state of revolution? Therefore their action upon society is revolutionary, they are not merely learning a technique of revolution, they themselves are in revolution. Am I making myself clear?
So when you ask what is my method, or technique of revolution, I say let us look first at what you mean by that word technique. Is it not more important, more essential, that you be revolutionary, and not merely try to find a technique of revolution? Now, why aren't you revolutionary? Why isn't there the new process of life in you? A new way of looking at life, a flame, a tremendous discontent? Why? Because, a person that is completely discontented, not merely discontented with certain things, but inherently discontented, need have no technique to be revolutionary. He is a revolution, and he is a danger to society, and such a man you call revolutionary. Now, why aren't you such a person? And for me, what is important is not the technique, but to make you be revolutionary, to help you to awaken to the importance of complete transformation. And when you are transformed, then you will be able to act, then there is the constant flow of newness, which is, after all, revolution.
Therefore, to me, the importance of inward revolution, of psychological transformation, is far greater than the outward revolution. The outward revolution is merely change, which is modified continuity; but inward revolution has no resting place, there is no stopping, it is constantly renewing itself. And that is what we need at the present time: a people who are completely discontented, and therefore ready to perceive the truth of things. A man who is complacent, a man who is satisfied with money, with position, with an idea, can never see truth. It is only the man who is discontented, who is investigating, who is asking, questioning, looking, that discovers truth, and such a person is a revolution in himself and therefore in his relationships. Therefore that which is his world - which is his relationship with people - he begins to transform. Then he affects the world within his own relationship. So, merely to look for a technique, or to inquire what is my technique for the new revolution, seems to me beside the point - or rather, that you miss the importance of being revolutionary in yourself; and to be a revolution in yourself, you must awaken to the environment, to that in which you live.
Sirs, any new culture, any new society, must begin with you. How did Christianity, Buddhism, or any other vital thing begin? With a few who really were aflame with the idea, with that feeling. They had their hearts open to a new life. They were a nucleus, not believing in something, but in themselves they had the experience of reality - reality of what they saw. And what you and I have to do, if I may suggest, is to see things for ourselves directly, not through a technique. Sir, you may read a love poem; you may read what love is, but if you have not experienced what love is, no amount of your reading, or learning the technique, will give you the perfume of love. And because we have not that love, we are looking for the technique. We are jaded we are famished, so we are superficially looking for a technique. A hungry man doesn't look for technique. He just goes after food, he doesn't stand outside the restaurant and smell the food. So when you ask for a technique it indicates that you are really not hungry. The `how' is not important, but why you ask the `how' is important.
So, there can be a revolution, the inward, continuous renewal, only when you understand yourself. You understand yourself in relationship, not in isolation. As nothing can live in isolation, to understand yourself, to have that knowledge of yourself at whatever level, can only be learnt in relationship. And as relationship is painful, is constantly in motion, we want to escape from it and find a reality outside of relationship. There is no reality outside of relationship. When I understand relationship, then that very understanding is reality. Therefore, one has to be extraordinarily alert, awake all the time watching, open to every challenge and to every suggestion and hint. But that demands a certain alertness of mind and heart; but most of us are asleep, most of us are frustrated, most of us have one foot in the grave, though we are young. Because we think in terms of achievement, we think in terms of gain, therefore we are never living; we are always concerned with the end; we are end-seekers, not people with life. Therefore, we are never revolutionary. If you are concerned directly with life, with living, and not with the idea about living, then you cannot help but be a revolution in yourself; you would be a revolution, because you are meeting life directly, not through the screen of words, prejudices, intentions and ends. And the man who meets life directly is a man who is in a state of discontent; and you must be in a state of discontent to find reality. And it is reality that releases, that frees; it is reality that frees the mind from its illusions and its creations. But to find reality, to be open to reality, is to be discontented. You cannot seek reality, it must come to you; but it can only come to you when the mind is completely discontented and ready. But most of us are afraid to be discontented because God knows where that discontent will lead us to. Therefore our discontent is hedged about with security, with safety, with carefully planned out action. And such a state of mind cannot understand truth. Truth is not static, for truth is timeless and the mind cannot follow truth, because the mind is the product of time; and that which is of time cannot experience that which is timeless. Truth comes to him who is in that state of discontent, but who does not seek an end; for the seeker of an end is the person who is seeking gratification; and gratification, satisfaction, is not truth.
January 16, 1949
Tags: #question #Krishnamurti
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
Muppet GIF of the Day
▬ :luigi_uhc: BoostedToday's #Muppets GIF of the Day is...
Tags: #muppets
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 1
▬ :luigi_uhc:
Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work.
— Étienne-Gabriel Morelly (Code of Nature — Or, The True Spirit of Laws, 1755)
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 0
Raurquiz
▬ :luigi_uhc: Boosted#PalisadesFire #palisades #CaliforniaWildfires #california #malibu #MalibuFires #wildfires #hollywood #losangeles
Tags: #palisadesfire #palisades #californiawildfires #california #malibu #malibufires #wildfires #hollywood #losangeles
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 1
Anarchism News
▬ :luigi_uhc: BoostedUnicorn Riot: **Permit for Pipeline Reconstruction Near Sacred Pipestone Site Rescinded After Tribal Pushback**
"St. Paul, MN — Minnesota regulators have rescinded a controversial permit allowing Magellan Pipeline Co. to reconstruct a petroleum pipeline near Pipestone National Monument, following sustained opposition from tribal nations, community groups, and environmental advocates. The decision, made during a recent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission… The post Permit for Pipeline Reconstruction Nea…"
https://unicornriot.ninja/2025/permit-for-pipeline-reconstruction-near-sacred-pipestone-site-rescinded-after-tribal-pushback/
#anarchism #bot
Tags: #anarchism #bot
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
Boosts: 1